The beat on bikes: The latest global trends from Garmin cyclists

The beat on bikes: The latest global trends from Garmin cyclists

Whether you’re a competitive cyclist with a need for speed or a casual rider ready for a more challenging course, we have global insights that can help you beat yesterday.

At Garmin, we know cyclists. We know how much you love getting the miles in on your bike. That’s because we love it too. All our cycling products — including Edge® bike computers, Rally™ power meter pedals, bike radars and lights, and more — are purpose-built to help you make the most out of your rides.

We also know how much you love the data you get when you ride with Garmin. That’s why we looked at data from Garmin cyclists riding with an Edge bike computer all over the world to find the latest trends.

Here are a few highlights:

How far did Garmin cyclists ride?

The sweet spot lies at an average of 28.59 miles per ride.

Age also played a role in how many miles users were able to squeeze in. Those ages 20–29 and 60–69 both rode just over 30 miles per ride, while those ages 30–39 and 40–49 rode just over 27 miles per ride on average.

A chart depicts the average miles per ride by age group. 20-29: 30.19 average miles per ride; 30-39: 27.59 average miles per ride; 40-49: 27.39 average miles per ride; 50-59: 28.68 average miles per ride; 60-69: 30.35 average miles per ride; 70+: 29.97 average miles per ride

These three locales went the distance and clocked the highest average miles per ride:

No matter how many miles you’re putting in — and whether you’re wanting to enjoy the ride or you’re looking for premium features — an Edge cycling computer can improve your time on the bike. If you need help choosing, not to worry: We can help.

Which locales are riding more?

When you ride with Garmin, you want to get out there more. We understand.

These were the top locales with the largest increases in number of cycling activities in 2025 compared to 2024:

For cyclists getting out on the road more, awareness and visibility are critical. That’s where our Varia rearview radars and smart lights come in. The Varia™ Vue headlight camera, for example, records video in 4K (requires memory card; not included1) and saves footage automatically if it detects an incident2, while a headlight with up to 600 lumens lights your way. And Varia RearVue 820 features a powerful and precise radar that provides reliable alerts, a tail light with up to 1.24 miles of visibility and advanced vehicle tracking.

How long did cyclists spend on each ride — and when did they go?

Garmin cyclists spent about 115 minutes on average on each ride. Older cyclists tended to ride longer than younger cyclists. While those ages 20–29 spent about 111.6 minutes per ride and those over age 70 spend about 134.2 minutes on average.

A chart depicts the average minutes per ride by age group: 20-29: 111.6 average minutes per ride; 30-39: 107 average minutes per ride; 40-49: 109.3 average minutes per ride; 50-59: 117.8 average minutes per ride; 60-69: 129.8 average minutes per ride; 70+: 134.2 average minutes per ride

Cyclists in the below locales spent quite a bit more time than others on their bikes:

As for the time of day, Garmin cyclists tended to kick off their rides in the early to mid-morning and late afternoon.

A chart depicts the time of day most Garmin cyclists start their rides in 24-hour time by the percent of rides recorded. 0: 0.05%; 1: 0.02%; 2: 0.03%; 3: 0.09%; 4: 0.97%; 5: 3.77%; 6: 5.81%; 7: 8.26%; 8: 11.18%; 9: 10.82%; 10: 8.07%; 11: 5.69%; 12: 5.30%; 13: 5.76%; 14: 5.50%; 15: 5.53%; 16: 6.43%; 17: 6.97%; 18: 5.30%; 19: 2.64%; 20: 1.06%; 21: 0.45%; 22: 0.22%; 23: 0.09%

Garmin Edge cyclists also recorded most of their rides on Sundays. And the most popular month of the year for all rides was August.

No matter when you choose to go, when you’re putting in that much time on each ride, the last thing you want to worry about is battery life. Edge 1050, for example, delivers up to 20 hours of battery life per day even in the most demanding use cases on a bright and vivid display, while Edge 1040 Solar offers up to 35 hours in demanding use cases and solar charging to extend that time even more — so you can ride longer and explore further.

How fast were cyclists riding?

Garmin cyclists rode an average speed of 14.89 mph.

When looking at age, we found younger cyclists typically rode at a faster pace than older cyclists.

A chart depicts the average speed in MPH of Garmin cyclists by age group. 20-29: 16.23; 30-39: 15.48; 40-49: 15.03; 50-59: 14.61; 60-69: 14.03; 70+: 13.4

These three locales recorded the fastest speeds globally:

What was the elevation of these rides?

Garmin cyclists recorded a global average elevation gain per ride of 1,158 feet per ride.

And while those ages 20–29 may have been riding the fastest, they weren’t climbing the most. That honor falls to those ages 60–69, with an average elevation gain of 1,201 feet per ride — nearly the equivalent height of the Empire State Building in New York City.

A chart depicts the average elevation gain in feet per ride of Garmin cyclists by age group. 20-29: 1,156.39; 30-39: 1,094.44; 40-49: 1,122.05; 50-59: 1,170.77; 60-69: 1,200.57; 70+: 1,122.25

These three locales recorded the highest average elevation per ride:

What is functional threshold power (FTP)? And how did Garmin cyclists perform?

What is FTP in cycling? It measures how much power in watts you can sustain without rapidly fatiguing — typically for about an hour — and is the gold standard in cycling. It helps you guide your training, optimize intensity and track changes in your performance over time. Powered by the Garmin Human Performance Lab, compatible Garmin devices estimate your FTP when you ride with a power meter (and a heart rate monitor for the most accurate results).

We found that the average max FTP for men was 224 and 188 for women. FTP was also typically the highest on average among younger cyclists, decreasing with age.

A chart depicts the average max FTP of Garmin cyclists by age group. 20-29: 224.61; 30-39: 223.77; 40-49: 222.34; 50-59: 218.79; 60-69: 213.63; 70+: 207.63

These three locales had the best average max FTP globally:

The average max FTP steadily increased as users rode more miles; the chart below shows what the weighted average max FTP was by the average weekly miles ridden.

A chart depicts the average max FTP of Garmin cyclists by the weekly average miles ridden. 0-20: 218; 20-40: 220; 40-60: 223; 60-80: 226; 80-100: 229; 100-120: 232; 120-140: 235; 140-160: 238; 160-180: 242; 180-200: 247; 200+: 251

We also looked at the top 1% of Garmin cyclists, defined as those who cycled 140 miles or more per week, for a recent snapshot of just how well they performed. The max FTP for elite cyclists on average was 243. For all other users, it was 220. (Hint: If you’re wanting to improve your FTP, try boosting your tolerance for high-intensity performance.)

If you’re looking for a power meter to help you get an FTP estimate, consider our versatile Rally 110 and 210 power meters. These deliver responsive and accurate performance data, durable designs, rechargeable batteries and so much more.

How does age and mileage affect your VO2 max?

Now, let’s get into VO2 max3. This is a number — the higher, the better — that defines your cardiorespiratory fitness and aerobic performance capacity. The Garmin Human Performance Lab engine in your Garmin cycling computer or watch estimates your VO2 max by identifying, analyzing and interpreting meaningful performance data during your ride based on your power and heart rate data.

The average VO2 max for all Garmin cyclists was 51. Similar to FTP, the average VO2 max was the highest among younger age groups and steadily decreased with age.

A chart depicts the average VO2 max of Garmin cyclists by age group. 20-29: 57; 30-39: 53; 40-49: 50; 50-59: 48; 60-69: 46; 70+: 42

Here’s the average VO2 max by the number of average weekly miles ridden: The more miles recorded each week, the higher the VO2 max.

A chart depicts the average VO2 max of Garmin cyclists by miles ridden per week. 0-20: 49; 20-20: 51; 40-60: 53; 60-80: 54; 80-100: 55; 100-120: 56; 120-140: 58; 140-160: 59; 160-180: 60; 180-200: 62; 200+: 64

To find the VO2 max of elite cyclists, we looked at those users with an average weekly mileage of 160 miles or more. The top cyclists recorded an average VO2 max of 62, while everyone else averaged 51.

If you’re looking for a way to get in your best cycling shape, consider the free and personalized Garmin Coach training plans in Garmin Connect™. With Garmin Cycling Coach, for example, and a compatible heart rate monitor and power meter, you’ll get a program that adapts based on your performance and recovery — using your VO2 max and FTP as the foundation.

Why should you ride with Garmin?

With an Edge bike computer (otherwise known as your bike’s best friend), you get valuable performance data, detailed mapping features and dedicated training data — all the essentials for a quality ride experience. When you also wear a Garmin smartwatch, you get important off-the-bike training and recovery data so you can take your cycling fitness and health monitoring to a new level. Add on a Rally power meter to help track your performance, and don’t forget about our rearview radars and smart lights that help give you peace of mind.

These devices work together to help you reach your goals, whether that’s training for a race or improving your overall fitness.

Learn more about choosing which Garmin bike computer is right for you and how you’ll benefit from insights for cyclists on Garmin smartwatches. Browse all of our cycling products to start improving your rides today.

1See Garmin.com/variavuememorycard

2Some jurisdictions regulate or prohibit use of this camera device. It is your responsibility to know and comply with applicable laws and rights to privacy in jurisdictions where you plan to use this device.

3See Garmin.com/ataccuracy